This blog post was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government

Avatar photo

Rob Fenn

Head of Human Rights and Democracy Department, FCO

Part of UK in Brunei

31st October 2012 London, UK

Vocational English: building a bridge between education and industry.

Does anyone own the English language? Of course not, thank Goodness! Though I sometimes wish there were an “Acronym Authority”.

Those questions cropped up in workshops I attended last week with 240 teachers from vocational and technical schools all over Brunei. The event was funded by the Ministry of Education, who have prioritised VTET – Vocational and Technical Education and Training.

Guest of Honour, members of SEAMEO VOCTECH, CfBT & Ministry of Education at the opening ceremony of the event

Or should that be VOCTECH, as in the title of the ASEAN Regional Centre which brought us together? SEAMEO, the South East Asian Ministers of Education Organisation, has based its vocational and technical training centre in Brunei.

Or were we really talking about TVET? Or VTEC? Those abbreviations are more commonly used in the UK, where the course content originated – made available in Brunei by CfBT, the British education Trust which has provided Anglophone teachers in Brunei’s schools for decades, and which is now responding to the Ministry’s new emphasis on…. well, you know what I mean.

As it turned out, only over acronyms were we “divided by a common language”. Otherwise, we were all on the same page. We agreed on the extraordinary importance of vocational and technical education: in Brunei, in ASEAN, and all round the world. Vocational training held the key to social harmony and economic development. We ignored this cohort of young people at our peril. Investment in the teachers who serve them could save from unemployment a generation of potential technicians whose skills were needed now; and would be needed even more in future. We had to “build a bridge between education and industry”.

We also agreed that Brunei’s consistent use of the English language as a medium of learning – through decades when some of the Sultanate’s neighbours had treated English as a political football – presented Brunei with a significant advantage, especially now ASEAN was integrating quickly, itself having adopted English as the official language of communication between South East Asian nations.

How has Brunei done this? Mainly by recognising that “English is the medium and not the message”. It is a tool, to be picked up and used alongside Malay, with both languages learned – and used for learning – side by side, from kindergarten (a fine English word). The “cultural neutrality” of the English language is understood by CfBT and – in our seminar – their specialists “walked the talk”; most of them dressed like their Bruneian colleagues, and all of them obviously at ease in the local milieu (another fine English word).

We have cooked up a plan – the British High Commission, Ministry of Education, CfBT and SEAMEO, along with academics from Oxford University for whom the “Brunei Success Story” is an object of scientific fascination – to tell this story to the region as a whole. We propose, at the SEAMEO Council in Hanoi next March, to unveil original research and show a short film which identify the main ingredients of Brunei’s recipe and serve it up for wider consumption, across ASEAN.

Meanwhile, I hope this blog of mine will prolong the lively debate begun at the CfBT seminar. The Ministry is developing an e-Forum for participants, which CfBT will help moderate.  In South East Asia, the world of education is changing fast. Those like Brunei, who embrace new techniques, will be able to lead and shape that change.

About Rob Fenn

Rob Fenn has been Head of the FCO’s Human Rights and Democracy Department since March 2014. His last formal responsibility for human rights was in the mid 1990s, when he…

Rob Fenn has been Head of the FCO’s Human Rights and Democracy Department
since March 2014. His last formal responsibility for human rights was in
the mid 1990s, when he served as UK Delegate on the Third Committee of
the General Assembly in New York (with annual excursions to what was
then the Commission on Human Rights in Geneva). Recent celebrations of
the twentieth anniversary of the creation of the post of UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights – a resolution he helped pilot through the
GA – came a shock. The intervening 20 years have flown: in Rome
(EU/Economics), in London (Southern European Department), in Nicosia
(Deputy High Commissioner) and latterly in Bandar Seri Begawan.
Rob,
Julia and their two sons loved Brunei, where British High Commissioners
are made especially welcome. The family’s activities included regular
walks in the pristine rainforest, expeditions upriver to help conserve
the Sultanate’s stunning biodiversity, and home movie making (in Brunei
it is almost impossible to take a bad photograph).
After
all those saturated colours, Rob worried that the move back to Britain
might feel like a shift into black and white. But the reunion with
family, friends and colleagues, and the boys’ brave reintegration into a
North London school, have been ample compensation. Julia’s main regret
is that, now she walks on Hampstead Heath, she no longer has an excuse
to carry a machete (“parang”).
Rob’s
problem is summed up in two types of reaction from friends outside the
office. On hearing that he is “in charge of human rights and democracy
at the FCO”, some think it sounds like a vast job: what else is there?
Others think it sounds wishy-washy: not in the national interest. Rob’s
mission is to take the Foreign Secretary’s dictum that “our values are
our interests”, and help his colleagues translate it into action in a
world so varied it can contain both Brunei’s clouded leopard and the
civil war in Syria.

Follow Rob