This blog post was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government

Dominic Meiklejohn

Part of UK in USA [New York]

15th October 2010 New York, USA

Blog Action Day 2010: Water Supply, Water Quality and Energy Use

I was surprised to learn recently that 3% of total electricity production in the United States is used by the municipal water and wastewater sector.  That’s a large number.  And that amount of electricity translates to about 45 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions.  These statistics are no doubt typical of water systems in other developed countries.  All in all, the amount of greenhouse gas savings that could be achieved by reducing water system energy consumption is not insignificant.  

Where can we achieve those efficiencies and emissions reductions?

One part of the solution is to design and build infrastructure that is more efficient.  Water and wastewater infrastructure are energy intensive systems.  Energy is consumed in pumping potable water, wastewater, treatment sludge, and treated wastewater; aeration of treatment sludge; lighting; water clarification; chlorination; etc.  Further, poor maintenance can contribute to system inefficiency (e.g., scaling inside pipes reduces flow capacity, thereby requiring heavier pumping).  Existing facilities can be retrofit with more energy efficient equipment (e.g., motors, blowers, pumps), and new facilities should be held to design standards that take into account energy consumption over the lifetime of the facility.  Implementing these energy efficiency solutions is a challenge and requires the right incentives for utilities to adapt energy efficient practices and the right technical/engineering support. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency just announced a policy to support increasing the sustainability of water infrastructure across the U.S. 

As part of this policy, EPA intends to work with states at the infrastructure planning stage to encourage water utilities to consider not only traditional planning issues (public health, water quality, rates, service levels), but new issues — climate change, energy efficiency and the merits of “green infrastructure” practices (e.g., rain gardens, porous pavements, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, etc.).  This policy could be made more rigorous by providing clear financial incentives to utilities, but it is a good example of the kinds of policies necessary to support sustainable infrastructure.

Energy-related greenhouse gas emissions can also be reduced at water and wastewater facilities simply by reducing the amount of water that is consumed.  The relationship between the volume of water that goes through the system and the system’s energy consumption is complex, but it is generally true that the less water means less energy consumption.  Public policies should support collaboration among utilities and their consumers to reduce water consumption.  Further, many communities can achieve energy savings in their wastewater systems by reducing the amount of stormwater that is captured in the wastewater system through “green infrastructure” (green roofs, open space preservation/restoration, porous pavement, rainwater harvesting, etc.).  At least 2 major U.S. cities (Philadelphia, PA and New York, NY) are well along the way in developing “green infrastructure” to manage their stormwater runoff.  Cities like these that embark on “green infrastructure” development will realize enormous energy savings due to reduced water treatment demands, but also substantial environmental benefits (urban heat island mitigation, improved air quality, reduction in stormwater volume and pollutants, enhanced groundwater recharge, etc.).  
    
Water, energy and climate change are inextricably linked, and it will be an on-going challenge to meet our increasing demands for water and energy while at the same time reduce our impact on the environment. 

Guest blog post from: Jane Kozinski, Senior Policy Advisor, British Consulate-General, New York, NY USA

About Dominic Meiklejohn

I was born in Woking, outside London, in 1967 and attended Merton College, Oxford University, graduating in Politics, Philosophy and Economics. After university, I worked for HM Customs and Excise…

I was born in Woking, outside London, in 1967 and attended Merton College, Oxford University, graduating in Politics, Philosophy and Economics.

After university, I worked for HM Customs and Excise before joining the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1990. After working for the European Community Department, I learned Polish and began a posting at the British Embassy Warsaw, where I headed the British Know How Fund for Poland (1993-96). In 1997, I worked for the OSCE Mission in Albania, before heading up the India team in the South Asian Department of the FCO. In 2000, I was posted as First Secretary to the British Embassy Warsaw, with a particular focus on European Union issues in the run-up to Poland’s accession to the EU. In 2003, I returned to the UK as Deputy Head of the Environment Policy Department. From 2004-2005, I led the FCO’s Knowledge Management Programme. During this period, I led two deployments of the FCO’s Consular Rapid Deployment Team– to Sri Lanka, after the tsunami in 2004 and to Pakistan, after the earthquake in 2005. From 2006-2007, I served as Deputy Consul-General, Basra, Iraq. From June 2007 I worked with the FCO’s Change Unit.

I took up my current appointment on 22 January 2008. My wife Joanne and I are the proud parents of Olivia. Outside of the office, I cycle around Manhattan, play soccer (football) and, when parenting duties allow, enjoy the cultural riches offered by New York. I try hard to understand baseball.

Follow Dominic

Tags

water